Jürgen Wollner

Jürgen Wollner

Jürgen Wollner

    Curriculum vitae

    Since 2015 board member „Association of German Certificated Endodontologists“(VDZE)

    Since 2013 collaboration at the „Initiative Frontzahntrauma“

    Since 2011 Trainer at the ZEISS Dental Academy, Author of several clinical articles in the Endodontology and CBCT

    2011 TEC2 Endodontology Curriculum under the scientific leadership of Prof. Martin

    Trope (University of Pennsylvania), key activities Endodontology

    Since 2010 Speaker in the fields Endodontology, CBCT and Ergonomics

    Since 2004 work at the dental microscope and practice for Microdentistry

    Since 1994 resident doctor in own doctor’s practice

    1994 Promotion at the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen

    1992 Approbation at the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen

    1986-1992 study of Dentology in Düsseldorf und Erlangen

     

    ABSTRACT

    Workshop/Interactive Lecture – Precongress

    Treatment planning with modern CBCT-Technology– Interactive Presentation

     

    The purpose of this presentation is to provide the advantages and benefits of CBCT in the diagnosis of endodontic disease and to create consequently an optimal Treatment plan for the patient. The introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for every day practice improved the diagnosis and therapy significantly in general Dentistry and especially in the endodontic treatment. The presence and location of periapical changes or root resorptions are identified more accurately and earlier through the CBCT. The additional information leads to a more accurate diagnosis and adequate therapy, thus results in a better treatment planning and prognosis estimation for the patient.
    The main advantages of CBCT are pointed out, especially for resorptive lesions or pain cases with negative radiographic findings. In addition, the limitations of CBCT are discussed and illustrated with clinical cases.
    In this interactive presentation standard and special cases will be presented and everyone of the audience can select the appropriate treatment plan via a voting system. Then the different results are presented and discussed together for each case.